Once strictly within the realms of science fiction, growing evidence shows that mankind is deliberately manipulating the Earth’s climate with a sinister undertone. The debate about climate change, once confined to man’s inadvertent warming by fossil fuels, is now within the apocalyptic military dimension and the United States is at the forefront of this new technology.
The growing significance of climate control as a weapon was not lost on former U.S. Secretary of Defense, William Cohen who, in April 1997at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, foretold: "Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves…. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counter terrorism] efforts."
Such strategic ‘advancements’ by developed nations not only runs counter to the environmentalist agenda of politicians but may also discredit the notion that all climatologists are working to ‘save the planet.’ We shall see that the hard facts are that the science of deliberate climate modification for military advantage is consuming a multi-billion dollar budget providing mind-boggling results.
As early as 1966 Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald, serving on the U.S. Presidential Science Advisory Committee and writing ‘How To Wreck The Environment,’ for his book ‘Unless Peace Comes,’ conceded that, "The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy. "
The 1996 publication, “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” by the U.S. Dept. of Defense took this a step further and envisioned controlling the ionosphere to create ‘artificial weather.’ The only known technology today that provides MacDonald’s real-world ‘key’ to human-induced environmental instability to bring about ‘artificial weather’ is the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), a cutting-edge science involving the artificial ionisation of the Earth’s atmosphere between 15,000 and 30,000 ft. and above.
The Sun’s radiation and ultraviolet rays have to cross the ionosphere to reach the earth thus if man can control the ionosphere then that potentially allows climate control. Thereafter, by manipulating the ionosphere and controlling solar-terrestrial interactions, it would be possible to create much larger effects. Ironically, because of the non – linear effects of climate, this means that a small input into the ionosphere may generate a large output.
Astrophysicist, Adam Trombly suggests an ’acupuncture model’ may be a viable manipulator via a multi-gigawatt pulsing of the ionosphere. While ‘Pravda’ have been quick to report on the sinister nature of this military climate changing technology that they say is, “conducted under the disguise of scientific research or the development of double-purpose technology."
World-renowned research scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell in her book, ‘Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War ‘(2000), confirms the disturbing likely impacts of this new age of climate control: "US military scientists … are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods."
All this has been taking place despite the United States being a signatory of the 1977 UN General Assembly resolution prohibiting the hostile use of environmental modification techniques. The resulting “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Technique (ENMOD)” committed the U.S. and all other signatories to refrain from any military or other hostile use of weather-modification that could result in widespread, long-lasting, or severe effects.
Dr.Bertell goes on to describe the HAARP as: "a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet." (Briarpatch, January 2000).
Ironically, the great significance of the ionosphere in climate is beginning to dawn on the climate science community at a time when the greenhouse gas theory is being disputed because, despite ever-increasing levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), the past 15 years has seen no ‘statistically significant’ global warming. A more favourable view is now being taken that it is sunspots and the natural electromagnetic radiation reaching the earth via the ionosphere that influences the Earth’s climate more than CO2.
With inevitable consequences on public policy considerations, Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa, warns of the danger of the Anglo-American partnership that controls the HAARP – a partnership between Raytheon Corporation (holding the patents), the US Air Force and British Aerospace Systems (BAES). Chossudovsky points out that: “‘Climatic warfare’ potentially threatens the future of humanity, but has casually been excluded from the reports for which the IPCC received the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.”
Chossudovsky is correct insofar as despite the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) having a mandate ‘to assess scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant for the understanding of climate change’ including environmental warfare, neither atmospheric ionisation manipulation nor HAARP is addressed in any of the thousands of pages of IPCC reports or supporting documents.
Business Wire (10 June 2004) describes the extraordinary device as being, “composed of 48 antenna elements and has a power capacity of 960,000 watts. When installed, the additional 132 transmitters will give HAARP a 3.6 mega-watt capacity”
It may turn out to be no coincidence that virtually all climate research is government funded. While on the world’s political stage the mainstream media are reporting on governments trying to reach agreement on limiting greenhouse gas emissions to ‘save the planet,’ climatologists may also be working illegally with military experts to perfect climate modifying weapons. But one thing we can be sure of is that a veil of secrecy has been cast over the whole venture as evidenced by the recent ‘Climategate’ scandal.