Greenhouse Gas Theory Discredited by ‘Coolant’ Carbon Dioxide

Science professor, a former global warming believer now denier, publishes groundbreaking paper to prove carbon dioxide cools, not warms, our atmosphere.

Professor Nasif Nahle found something deeply troubling about the man-made global warming theory (AGW). He explains, “I started out wanting to debunk those deniers of science.” Nahle had originally believed that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) were warming the atmosphere until he found an incorrect assumption within the greenhouse effect hypothesis.

Invited to attend a televised debate on the Indonesian Tsunami that addressed whether global warming was a factor in that catastrophe, Nahle checked the validity of calculations relating to the combined reactions of certain atmospheric gases to solar radiation in the so-called greenhouse effect. “That was when I saw it was junk science.”

Global Warming Scare is “Anti-science”

 

In an astonishing personal U-turn Nahle has taken on the task of demonstrating that the demonization of CO2 was premised on a faulty hypothesis. Nahle completed his controversial study with the assistance of American physicist, Dr. Charles Anderson. Anderson is one of eight coauthors of the controversial book, ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon’ that also falsifies the ‘greenhouse gas’ effect. Nasif says, “Dr. Anderson and I found that the coolant effect of the carbon dioxide is stronger when oxygen is included into the mixture.”

Nasif says, “To my surprise, I found that the hypothesis was flawed and that the AGW proponents were inventing variables and constants. As I starting to apply the correct data and algorithms, I was realizing that the whole hypothesis was wrong from the physics standpoint."

The 60-year-old’s career is now firmly focused on climate-related research; in 2010 he began working on Climate Change and Biodiversity at the Superior School of Biology, University Juarez of the State of Durango. Nahle is so converted in his thinking that he now calls the greenhouse gas theory, ”antiscience" and "pseudoscience.”

 

Read more here.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

2 responses to “Greenhouse Gas Theory Discredited by ‘Coolant’ Carbon Dioxide

  1. Anonymous

    CO2 neither warms nor cools
    To date, I have provided the only definitive evidence for the effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration on atmospheric temperature. That decisive evidence lies in the proper comparison of temperatures in the atmospheres of Venus and Earth (the former containing 96.5% CO2, the latter only 0.04% CO2). This comparison, which I have done and reported on at:
    Venus: No Greenhouse Effect
    makes it plain that the difference between the Venus and Earth temperatures, compared at equal pressures in the two atmospheres, over a broad range of pressures, is due entirely and precisely to the two planets’ distances from the Sun, nothing else. Their great difference in atmospheric CO2 concentration has no effect whatsoever, either warming or cooling. I submitted this evidence in a letter to “Physics Today” on Feb. 7th of this year, but have had no response, which means it is being suppressed from an open airing in a peer-reviewed science publication. Scientists don’t want to face the fact that this overwhelming hard evidence (from two detailed planetary atmospheres), simply and unambiguously disproves the greenhouse effect theory; and since this data has been available since 1991, it shows that every scientist who has promulgated the greenhouse effect since then is incompetent, and should be given no credibility whatsoever. This applies especially to Dr. James Hansen, a leading “global warming” alarmist who has largely made his career by promulgating the greenhouse effect. But it is just as wrong to claim that more CO2 cools rather than warms, in the face of the Venus/Earth evidence. Obviously, for these two planets with hugely different CO2 concentrations, it does neither.

    • Re: CO2 neither warms nor cools
      Harry,
      I agree that the peer review process is likely corrupt. It has recently come to light among us ‘Slayers’ of the GHE that there is an international ‘grading system’ among science journals that ranks publications in their adherence to an arbitrary code that is sinister and corruptive of an objective peer review process.
      We have reasons to suspect that a lower ranked journal may be the subject of such pressure to not consider publishing papers submitted from researchers belonging to the Slayers group.
      The consequences of scientific misconduct can be severe at a personal level for both perpetrators and any individual who exposes it.
      Most reasonable scientists do not need me to tell them that this is not only unconscionable and unethical and contrary to the interests of science per se, but let’s be clear here, suppression—the failure to publish significant findings due to the results being adverse to the interests of the researcher or his/her sponsor(s) may constitute criminal fraud if such collusion protects those who have sought to benefit financially or otherwise from their misrepresentation.
      That there appears to be a lack of will amongst some self-serving governments to properly investigate and deal with such misconduct now makes it incumbent upon the wider community of scientists to unite under a new umbrella organization willing to take action, in courts of law if necessary, to weed out those who tarnish the good name of all conscientious scientists. This will be a key rallying message of Principia Scientific International (PSI) when it is formed later in 2011.
      With the groundswell of support for Dr. Tim Ball, in his principled stand against corruption in climate science (i.e. Dr. Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann v. Dr. Tim Ball libel case) we feel sure PSI will succeed where politicians and navel-gazing national science academies have failed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s