New Satellite Data Contradicts Carbon Dioxide Climate Theory

Industrialized nations emit far less carbon dioxide than the Third World, according to latest evidence from Japan's Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).

 Global warming alarmism is turned on its head and the supposed role of carbon dioxide in climate change may be wrong, if the latest evidence from Japan's scientists is to be believed.

Japanese national broadcaster, NHK World broke the astonishing story on their main Sunday evening news bulletin (October 30, 2011). Television viewers learned that the country's groundbreaking IBUKI satellite, launched in June 2009, appears to have scorched an indelible hole in conventional global warming theory.

Standing in front of a telling array of colorful graphs, sober-suited Yasuhiro Sasano, Director of Japan's National Institute for Environmental Studies told viewers, "The [IBUKI satellite] map is to help us discover how much each region needs to reduce CO2 [carbon dioxide] emissions."

 Industrialized Nations World's Lowest CO2 'Polluters'

 Indeed, the map at which JAXA spokesman Sasano was pointing been expected by most experts to show that western nations are to blame for substantial increases in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide, causing global warming. But to an officious looking TV interviewer Sasano turned greenhouse gas theory on it's head.

 According to UN science the greenhouse gas theory says more CO2 entering the atmosphere will warm the planet, while less CO2 is associated with cooling.

 Gesturing to an indelible deep green hue streaked across the United States and Europe viewers were told, "in the high latitudes of the Northern hemisphere emissions were less than absorption levels."

Sasano proceeded to explain the color-coding system of the iconic maps showing where regions were either absorbing or emitting the trace atmospheric gas. Regions were alternately colored red (for high CO2 emission), white (low or neutral CO2 emissions) and green (no emissions: CO2 absorbers).

Bizarrely, the IBUKI maps prove exactly the opposite of all conventional expectations revealing that the least industrialized regions are the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases on the planet.

Yes, you read that correctly: the U.S. and western European nations are areas where CO2 levels are lowest. This new evidence defies the consensus view promoted by mainstream newspapers, such as the New York Times.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had long claimed that, "there is a consensus among scientists that manmade emissions of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide (CO2), are harming global climate."

The Japanese satellite map shows regions colored the deepest leaf green (net absorbers of CO2) being predominantly those developed nations of Europe and North America; thus indicating built up environments absorbed more CO2 than they emitted into the atmosphere.

By contrast the bulk of the regions colored red (so-called 'carbon polluters') were in undeveloped, densely forested equatorial regions of Africa and South America.

Huge Headache for Climate Policymakers

JAXA boasts that, "we can reduce the error of the estimated values when we introduce IBUKI's observation data compared to that of the values calculated in a conventional way based on ground observation data."

 To all policymakers who study the Japanese maps it is apparent that the areas of greatest CO2 emissions are those regions with least human development and most natural vegetation: Equatorial Third World nations.

The Japanese evidence also disproves the often-cited hypothesis that Siberia and other areas of northern Russia were natural vents for large scale CO2 outgassing, exacerbating global warming fears.

 In effect, this compelling new data appears to show that the ashphalt and concreted industrial nations are 'mopping up' carbon dioxide faster than their manufacturers and consumers can emit it. If this is confirmed, it means a cornerstone of man-made global warming may be in serious doubt.

Can Western Nations Still Proceed with Carbon Taxes?

But now that these so-called "global warming gases" have been precisely measured across the planet the quandary for international policymakers is what to do about plans to further implement international targets for CO2 reduction.

 World leaders are getting set to face the latest round of UN climate change talks in Durban next month and must discuss a replacement for the soon to expire Kyoto Protocol, which binds nations to limited CO2 emissions.

The dilemma is whether the established UN global warming policy of the 'polluter pays' can any longer be sensibly upheld. Conventional political thinking at previous UN climate conferences was to 'offset' carbon emissions by making the worst polluters pay higher 'carbon taxes.'

 But that theory now appears to be rendered redundant being that western economies, believed to be the worst offenders, are in fact, contributing either negligible or no measurable CO2 emissions whatsoever.

Indeed, the IBUKI data indicates that the areas of highest CO2 emissions are precisely those regions with most vegetation and least industry and thus less able to pay.

 Thus, the unthinkable could be made real: the greenhouse gas theory of climate change may collapse in the face of empirical evidence that industrialization is shown to have no link to global warming.

 For more information the IBUKI achievement is published in the Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere (an online thesis magazine) issued by the Meteorological Society of Japan.


JAXA, Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, Greenhouse Gas Observation Satellite 'IBUKI' (GOSAT), accessed online: October 30, 2011.

Gillis, J.,'Study Affirms Consensus on Climate Change,' New York Times, ( accessed online: October 30, 2011)


Copyright. Contact the author to obtain permission for republication.



Filed under Uncategorized

8 responses to “New Satellite Data Contradicts Carbon Dioxide Climate Theory

  1. found your site on today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later

  2. Keep posting stuff like this i really like it

  3. IBUKI(GOSAT) satellite
    Here a link to a pdf of the study which tells a different much less dramatic story:
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    1st) the study is about CO2/CH4 flux: emission, absorption, movement.
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    2nd) the study maps are part of a time lapse, that presents a way different interpretation that one specially selected frame. See

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    3rd) the satellite measures both manmade and natural GHG sources so it is easy to be mislead since manmade gases are admittedly a small portion of all GHG emissions.
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    4th) the study in no way undermines the know physics of GHGs and to imply as much is misleading.
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    I’m sure I’m missing another couple points, but these alone, together with the articles general tone show that O’sullivan’s article was an advocacy piece of writing that did not properly report on the IBUKI(GOSAT) study and news release.

  4. Out of context…
    I just wanted to point out that the chart you used was from July of 2009, whereas a chart from October of 2009 shows the opposite result. This was because the primary conclusion the researchers made was that CO2 levels are increased in winter and decreased in summer (due to changing levels of fossil fuel burning and plant photosynthesis). What ISN’T mentioned is that there is any sort of conclusion to be drawn on whether the levels vary due to “third world” versus industrialized nations, as you pointed out. See the official press release for reference (It’s figure 3)
    Hopes that helps to clear up any confusion.

  5. Anonymous

    Are you joking?
    Here is more of that image:

  6. Что для Вас Новый год?
    Добрый день! Приглашаем Вас Ваших близких учавствовать в
    предпраздничном конкурсе “Что такое Новый Год?” 🙂 Сочините
    рассказ, сделайте фото-снимок, снимите видео с Вами или с Вашими домашними на тему “Что такое Новый Год” и выиграйте полезные
    призы от компании по производству фильтров для воды “Барьер”. Узнай подробней о конкурсе -

  7. Anonymous

    science never stands on only 1 study
    (Good Work) – I want to believe these Japanese stats, but I am suspicious of all stats where there is a cultural bias to tell people what they want to hear.
    – So corroboration would be good… and why hasn’t this result been produced before ? supressed ?
    A Dutch analysis once showed lots of earth cooling smog due to carbon particulates from all the wood fueled cookers (& slash & burn) in the developing world.

  8. Anonymous

    science never stands on only 1 study

    (Good Work) – I want to believe these Japanese stats, but I am suspicious of all stats where there is a cultural bias to tell people what they want to hear.
    – So corroboration would be good… and why hasn’t this result been produced before ? supressed ?
    A Dutch analysis once showed lots of earth cooling smog due to carbon particulates from all the wood fueled cookers (& slash & burn) in the developing world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s