Climategate: U.S. Lawyers to the rescue!
Thanks to that learned sceptic number cruncher, Lord Monckton, the former advisor to the British government, top lawyers are now perfecting their legal briefs to derail the eco-fascist juggernaut. The Al Bore’s of that green world refused to heed their courtroom lessons from before and will now face even sterner consequences upon the emergence of the ‘Climategate’ scandal. The avuncular viscount says it’s all to do with the phoney IPCC graphs. Regular observers of this long-running saga will recall that this titanic green machine is no stranger to legal setbacks. Al Bore’s documentary, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ fell foul of a UK high court judge who pointed out Al’s ‘nine scientific errors.’ Despite that legal slap on the hand the snake oil salesmen kept on selling.
It has been succinctly pointed out by Lord Monckton that the iconic graphs splashed across almost all IPCC documents were known by them to be fraudulent. This is according to Monckton who claims to have personally notified the chairman of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, a former railroad engineer of such facts but was wilfully ignored. And I am not one to doubt Monckton because there is no doubt that he has taken legal advice and is aware that his allegations, if they were proved false, would land him in court on libel charges. But Lord Monckton is not being hauled before any court or even threatened in any way for statements. Therefore, ladies and gentlemen, we may well assume the IPCC knows the viscount speaks the truth and the world’s leaders are teetering on the edge of greatest fraud the planet has yet seen.
Today Lord Monckton has been carefully explaining the technicalities of the dodgy data for the benefit of the best legal minds so that they can more eloquently prosecute their case. The eco-fascists have been data raping those ‘catastrophic’ climate change numbers all along. Lord Monckton’s index finger has been theatrically placed on the pointy great curves of that stochastic time-series (from the Greek meaning “a guess”, making stochastic data volatile and unpredictable). He has shown us the emperor has no clothes, they been lost in the climate spin machine upon a wisp of spurious acceleration and deceleration ‘trends.’ So confident is Monckton in his sums that he’s no longer pulling any punches.
Now based on my experience as a legal advocate in both the US and UK and what I see presented by Lord Monckton, I believe that the many well-funded litigants now serving writs on those dodgy climatologists will totally discredit the warmist movement tying them up in courtrooms for the next two or three years.
Now we get to delve into a conspiracy that is a theory no more. For once proof of a data fraud has been established we then look at the shady beneficiaries who have garnered academic privilege and government grants from such mischief. Here we find the den of devilry has a paper trail of emails leading from the Penn State University computer of Michael Mann and his hockey team across the Atlantic to the Internet server of Professor Phil Jones and his hockey stickers of at the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU). The Professor Joneses and Michael Mann’s of this world will never have the time or resources to do climate ‘research’ ever again. The whole ‘hockey team’ is a busted flush.
This was always going to be for the greens a loose coalition of unlikely accomplices ranging from the extreme left of the communists at Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth and the far right of the rich elite of Bilderberg, the Club of Rome, the Murdoch-moneyed mainstream media all cozied up with those self-serving politicians. We were able to expose the fragility of that axis of evil after Climategate and now on the world stage in Copenhagen the scam is unravelling in front of the eyes of the whole world.
Climategate Professor Phil Jones is very much in the frame to be indicted under US federal laws for conspiracy to defraud US tax funding. The leaked CRU emails include much of his correspondence with American-based climatologists, Michael Mann, Kevin Trenberth, etc. They are all key contributors to the IPCC policy statements process and influential advisers. Between them they have influenced the spending of over $50 billion spent worldwide by governments seeking to prove a link between co2 and climate. In the leaked email entitled, 1120676865.txt, Jones says:
Mike’s response could do with a little work, but as you say he’s got the tone almost dead on. I hope I don’t get a call from congress! I’m hoping that no-one there realizes I have a US DoE grant and have had this (with Tom W.) for the last 25 years. I’ll send on one other email received for interest.
Note the worried tone in his comment? Jones (or more precisely, his department) has benefited to the tune of almost $20 million in funding from US and UK government sources. Both jurisdictions have similar laws relating to malfeasance of public office as well as safeguards for public interest under their separate freedom of information acts. The UK and US have exemplary extradition treaties under the Hague Convention and Professor Jones has made himself a prime candidate on RICO racketeering charges as well as spoliation (destruction of evidence) being that he admits destroying data. If he is convicted for those offences he may serve a maximum penalty of 20 years in jail and/or a fine of up to $250,000. If I were him I’d be a very worried man. As they say in New York, he’d better get lawyered up damn quick!
A lengthy discovery process will precede any court action. What I noticed this week was that the University of East Anglia, contrary to the public statement 10 days ago, has removed pages from their website that contained portions of the disputed data. This may be indicative of a presumption that litigation (criminal and/or civil) is in the pipeline.
Now you don’t need to be an expert scholar of the stochastic time-series to interpret the deafening silence from the IPCC about these allegations. This story is a corker and will run and run!
Short bio: John O’Sullivan is a legal advocate and writer who for several years has litigated against government corruption and conspiracy cases in both the US and Britain. Website: http://johnosullivan.livejournal.com/