Tag Archives: phil jones

Climategate One Year on – the Curious Case of a Lost Police Report

One year on and still British police do not report on their Climategate investigations. But with private police investigating the crime are we right to suspect a government cover up?

 

Skeptics refuse to let Climategate go away quietly. As we shall see below – even 12 months on – legal analysts show how climate criminals can still be put behind bars. If only UK police applied a more powerful legal instrument: the Fraud Act (2006) discredited government scientists could be prosecuted today.

 

Those of us with a modicum of legal training have been saying it all along; with the expertise of the Serious Fraud Office instead of those dawdling backwoods country bobbies, Professor Phil Jones and other accomplices linked with the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), University of East Anglia, England could all be put behind bars serving a ten-year stretch.

 

A Little Back Story to Refresh the Jaded Mind

 

A year ago this week over a thousand damning emails were leaked (or hacked). Independent scientists who studied them in detail affirm unlawful conduct by government paid scientists at the CRU, the world’s leading center for “climate data homogenization.”

 

The CRU’s “homogenization” process itself became the subject of much suspicion insofar as it was always known to be a gray area in science where unscrupulous characters could easily interpose personal bias and cherry-pick the data to make it say whatever they wanted.

 

So dubious and discredited is the climatologists’ homogenization technique that the New Zealand government recently abandoned their nation’s “official” record that employed it.

 

As history now shows an indelible stain is left on Britain’s credibility. Professor Jones, who ran CRU’s illicit operation, was allowed to get away with the crime destroying key climate data in blatant contempt of a lawful freedom of information (FOIA) requirement.  Thereafter, a weak self-serving British government ensured that three subsequent “inquiries” whitewashed all involved. Never once did any of these apologists for fraud address the fakery in the science nor hear witness testimony against the accused.

 

Despite tens of thousands of scientists condemning CRU’s junk science they were all ignored.

 

Pointedly, no one was ever arrested for the alleged “hacking” and the neat way the files in those emails were collated and carefully itemized suggested that a whistleblower’s hand had been at work.

 

The Key Conspirator Admitted his Criminal Intent

 

Any Crown prosecutor would slaver over the evidence against Jones. The leaked emails conclusively proved Jones admitted his criminal intent. Not only did he implicate himself he asked his colleagues to conspire with him to destroy key data because he said he would destroy everything in his possession rather than comply with the law.

 

Indeed, when the police went in they found that Jones had carried out his threat – all the metadata – the calculations used to dishonestly ‘homogenize’ cooler raw temperatures into warmer ‘official’ data were gone. The ‘Jones dog ate it.’ What more proof does it take to get the British government to admit that climate crimes were committed?

 

And no one involved, from the government to the police to the UK Information Commissioners’ Office has ever had the cahones to deny that CRU acted unlawfully – except, of course, the scum that run the University of East Anglia (UEA). At the very earliest opportunity they patted their man on the back and welcomed him back into that corrupt fold with the royal blessing of eco-fascist, Prince Charles.

 

You have to feel sorry for a whole crop of honest hard-working UEA graduates now forever tarnished by this scandal and ashamed to admit they studied under such a degenerate regime.

 

And still the apologists for eco-fraud will try to tell you that the police was not entrusted with investigating Jones, just the “hacking” incident – but they’d be wrong. That’s how willfully ignorant of the law those cynics are.

 

Private Police Unit Ensures No Public Accountability in Cover Up

 

Some of us with legal training smelt a rat when the investigation was first entrusted to Norfolk Constabulary. Why was this case, potentially the biggest international criminal fraud of all time palmed off onto plodding country constables?

 

But then it got worse! Almost immediately it was announced that ‘aiding’ Norfolk’s ‘finest’ was a secretive private police unit, the National Domestic Extremism Team (NDET). Yes, you read that right – a private police unit was in on the act. Now why would this be, we may wonder? Perhaps it may have to do with their pension fund?

 

And where the hell was the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) when required? The SFO are mandated under law to take over any fraud case where more than £500,000 is involved and/or there’s an international dimension. Moreover, unlike the SFO the NDET were under no obligation to abide by the Freedom of Information (FOIA) Act. Like Jones, they got a green light from the authorities to play fast and loose with the evidence and then get away with it.

 

So throughout the coldest winter for 30 years progress in the investigations froze as completely as the weather. With no SFO in the picture (publicly accountable) and Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and NDET not accountable, being totally exempt from freedom of information laws (FOIA) this investigation went nowhere fast.

 

Norfolk’s plodders and the secretive NDET, maintaining a clandestine line of communication with ACPO, that other private and unaccountable clique, had a clear run to implement the cover up. It’s lasted a year so far – can they go the full distance? Such is the woeful state of British justice today.

 

Let’s Nail the Climate Fraudsters

 

Today we see the same navel-gazing mainstream media not telling you the truth about how Jones and his accomplices can still be arrested, tried and jailed under the Fraud Act. Unlike that lesser toothless statute there is no time bar at all under the tougher Fraud Act when hunting down such complex international criminal conspiracies.

 

But why in a recession, should a cash-strapped government or their buddies in the media let you know you’ve been conned about climate in so many different ways?

 

Britain’s political masters deigned to give you three whitewash inquiries and one sham police investigation – what else do you Briton’s want? The clowns in charge have a recession to beat (you know, the one they dragged you all into!) and they must protect at all costs the needless tens of billions a year they want from you in crippling green taxes imposed under their foolish Climate Change Act (2007). Under that travesty Britain is legally mandated to cut is carbon dioxide emissions by a ridiculous 80% during a period when our planet is cooling!

 

Thus duped by a willfully self-serving and morally corrupt British government its public apathy that lets the corrupt get away with stealing the shirts off your backs. But nonetheless, many of us are still determined to ‘crack the climate fraud wide open.’

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Lord Monckton Ups the Ante

Climategate: U.S. Lawyers to the rescue!

Thanks to that learned sceptic number cruncher, Lord Monckton, the former advisor to the British government, top lawyers are now perfecting their legal briefs to derail the eco-fascist juggernaut. The Al Bore’s of that green world refused to heed their courtroom lessons from before and will now face even sterner consequences upon the emergence of the ‘Climategate’ scandal. The avuncular viscount says it’s all to do with the phoney IPCC graphs. Regular observers of this long-running saga will recall that this titanic green machine is no stranger to legal setbacks. Al Bore’s documentary, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ fell foul of a UK high court judge who pointed out Al’s ‘nine scientific errors.’ Despite that legal slap on the hand the snake oil salesmen kept on selling.

It has been succinctly pointed out by Lord Monckton that the iconic graphs splashed across almost all IPCC documents were known by them to be fraudulent. This is according to Monckton who claims to have personally notified the chairman of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, a former railroad engineer of such facts but was wilfully ignored. And I am not one to doubt Monckton because there is no doubt that he has taken legal advice and is aware that his allegations, if they were proved false, would land him in court on libel charges. But Lord Monckton is not being hauled before any court or even threatened in any way for statements. Therefore, ladies and gentlemen, we may well assume the IPCC knows the viscount speaks the truth and the world’s leaders are teetering on the edge of greatest fraud the planet has yet seen.

Today Lord Monckton has been carefully explaining the technicalities of the dodgy data for the benefit of the best legal minds so that they can more eloquently prosecute their case. The eco-fascists have been data raping those ‘catastrophic’ climate change numbers all along. Lord Monckton’s index finger has been theatrically placed on the pointy great curves of that stochastic time-series (from the Greek meaning “a guess”, making stochastic data volatile and unpredictable). He has shown us the emperor has no clothes, they been lost in the climate spin machine upon a wisp of spurious acceleration and deceleration ‘trends.’ So confident is Monckton in his sums that he’s no longer pulling any punches.

Now based on my experience as a legal advocate in both the US and UK and what I see presented by Lord Monckton, I believe that the many well-funded litigants now serving writs on those dodgy climatologists will totally discredit the warmist movement tying them up in courtrooms for the next two or three years.

Now we get to delve into a conspiracy that is a theory no more. For once proof of a data fraud has been established we then look at the shady beneficiaries who have garnered academic privilege and government grants from such mischief. Here we find the den of devilry has a paper trail of emails leading from the Penn State University computer of Michael Mann and his hockey team across the Atlantic to the Internet server of Professor Phil Jones and his hockey stickers of at the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU). The Professor Joneses and Michael Mann’s of this world will never have the time or resources to do climate ‘research’ ever again. The whole ‘hockey team’ is a busted flush.

This was always going to be for the greens a loose coalition of unlikely accomplices ranging from the extreme left of the communists at Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth and the far right of the rich elite of Bilderberg, the Club of Rome, the Murdoch-moneyed mainstream media all cozied up with those self-serving politicians. We were able to expose the fragility of that axis of evil after Climategate and now on the world stage in Copenhagen the scam is unravelling in front of the eyes of the whole world.

Climategate Professor Phil Jones is very much in the frame to be indicted under US federal laws for conspiracy to defraud US tax funding. The leaked CRU emails include much of his correspondence with American-based climatologists, Michael Mann, Kevin Trenberth, etc. They are all key contributors to the IPCC policy statements process and influential advisers. Between them they have influenced the spending of over $50 billion spent worldwide by governments seeking to prove a link between co2 and climate. In the leaked email entitled, 1120676865.txt, Jones says:
“Neville,
Mike’s response could do with a little work, but as you say he’s got the tone almost dead on. I hope I don’t get a call from congress! I’m hoping that no-one there realizes I have a US DoE grant and have had this (with Tom W.) for the last 25 years. I’ll send on one other email received for interest.
Cheers
Phil”
Note the worried tone in his comment? Jones (or more precisely, his department) has benefited to the tune of almost $20 million in funding from US and UK government sources. Both jurisdictions have similar laws relating to malfeasance of public office as well as safeguards for public interest under their separate freedom of information acts. The UK and US have exemplary extradition treaties under the Hague Convention and Professor Jones has made himself a prime candidate on RICO racketeering charges as well as spoliation (destruction of evidence) being that he admits destroying data. If he is convicted for those offences he may serve a maximum penalty of 20 years in jail and/or a fine of up to $250,000. If I were him I’d be a very worried man. As they say in New York, he’d better get lawyered up damn quick!
A lengthy discovery process will precede any court action. What I noticed this week was that the University of East Anglia, contrary to the public statement 10 days ago, has removed pages from their website that contained portions of the disputed data. This may be indicative of a presumption that litigation (criminal and/or civil) is in the pipeline.
Now you don’t need to be an expert scholar of the stochastic time-series to interpret the deafening silence from the IPCC about these allegations. This story is a corker and will run and run!
Acknowledgement: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/17/lord-monckton-reports-on-pachauris-eye-opening-copenhagen-presentation/

Short bio: John O’Sullivan is a legal advocate and writer who for several years has litigated against government corruption and conspiracy cases in both the US and Britain. Website: http://johnosullivan.livejournal.com/

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized